A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between prospective neighbours around the development of a wall in a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes attracted countrywide notice following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones property at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of arranging breaches, environmental worries, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier and the Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a remarkably publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, search for to develop their family members dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of broader disputes together Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their future neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are topic to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach of their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partly designed, is in the right posture. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The pair accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their see, an allegation which has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of The ocean are each hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Times, a picture which has due to the fact turn into emblematic with the depth in the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they have been meant to Get visual proof on the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Moments documented, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning turned One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of steps were cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a region influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately with the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard further more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second during the legal timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as made, goes beyond what was authorized and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and ailments connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the realm and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple simply endeavoring to build a household dwelling in accordance While using the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that all works have already been performed based upon Specialist suggestions and accepted designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea through a storm, usually do not alter the underlying facts.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how setting up disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description to get a predicament that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea concentrations rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Situations report about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had Earlier been linked to community advocacy on planning and environmental issues, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from extremely distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, became synonymous with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions and René Collier waded through waist-large h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth in the coastline plus the symbolic character of your act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal solution.
As the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The courtroom have to establish whether the wall as designed complies with preparing authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and setting up disorders. Nevertheless the human component continues to be central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another lengthy following the lawful expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above design is effective at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation extend over and above that tackle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. It also underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns for instance environmental protection and assets legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of your dispute stands partly created, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. Regardless of whether it'll in the long run be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most carefully viewed planning disputes in north Dublin recently.